Exploring the Relevance of Asset Liability Duration Matching in P&C Companies: Myth or Must?
Introduction
The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023 served as a wake-up call for the banking industry, highlighting the critical importance of asset liability management (ALM). Banks may need to liquidate assets to meet customers’ cash flow needs, sometimes realizing losses at inopportune times. This focus on ALM is not unique to banking; it is also a cornerstone of risk management in the insurance industry. Life insurance companies, in particular, employ ALM approaches to manage risk. Their investment portfolios need to be “liability-driven” due to the unique nature of their life insurance and annuity products.
When it comes to Property and Casualty (P&C) insurance companies, the benefits of incorporating asset liability duration matching in constructing asset portfolios are less clear. Unlike life insurance companies, P&C insurers deal with shorter-term and more unpredictable liabilities, such as claims from natural disasters or bodily injury, potentially leading them to perhaps think about ALM differently. This paper will first outline the various ALM approaches used by life insurance companies. We will then examine the enterprise, fixed income, and liability profiles of P&C companies based on the latest public statutory statements.